Contributors
Project Leads
Adam Schiabor,
Urban Green Council
Sean Brennan,
Urban Green Council
Development and Design
Data and Modelling
James Perakis,
Elementa Engineering
Julia Sokol,
Integral Group
Project Consultant
Klaar De Schepper,
Flux Tailor
Project Support
John Mandyck,
Urban Green Council
Chris Anjesky,
Urban Green Council
Sheena Thiruselvan,
Urban Green Council
Jack Archambault,
Urban Green Council
Blake Mills,
Urban Green Council
This tool is possible through generous support from:
Research Methodology
To reach NYC’s climate goals, we must electrify most of our energy use. This conversion will require a new generation of technologies. Transitioning to these technologies, like heat pumps in buildings, will be challenging. But there is a critical underlying issue that must be addressed concurrently: Is our grid ready to power building electrification?
The research presented in this tool—and companion report—shows that NYC’s local grid is ready. The results show how power demand changes as New York City’s one million buildings replace today’s heat and hot water systems that use fossil fuels with air-source heat pumps. These power demand predictions were reached through a multitiered analysis. Engineers created a series of energy models, calibrated them against measured data, then electrified heat and hot water loads and aggregated the results citywide. Citywide power demands were then compared against capacities from Con Edison’s public data for network areas.
The general methodology of this process is as follows. For a more detailed description, reference the Appendix in the report starting on page 40.
Map Guide
Overview:
This mapping tool highlights some of the ways building electrification will increase and shift power demand across New York City. Electrification will be a revolutionary change, and capacity upgrades will be needed inside buildings and on the local grid to accommodate it. This tool is designed to show where winter peaks will occur first and the capacity for electrification given NYC’s current grid.
You can select two different geographical zones: zip code or network area. Network areas are the most relevant geography to compare power supply and demand since each network has a specific capacity. Con Edison maintains 70 network areas with underground cables, as well as much smaller non-network systems. The network areas serve more than 80 percent of customers and account for almost 90 percent of electricity delivered, so they are the focus of our analysis.
Power supply does not follow zip code boundaries, so identifying capacity for electrification is not available in the zip code view. Instead, the summer or winter peak and change in peak demand metrics show the relationship between electrification and power demand at this level. The timing of each zip code’s flip to a winter peak depends on which of its buildings electrify and how much energy efficiency and flexibility is included. The grid must be built out to meet peak power demand, so forecasting peak seasons can help plan infrastructure upgrades to support electrification.
Improvements at every level of the grid will be required once 20 percent of NYC’s total floor area electrifies their heating and hot water. But the amount of energy efficiency, load flexibility and storage installed alongside heat pumps will make those improvements manageable and will be essential to ensuring a reliable power supply.
Zone:
Metrics:
Electrification Adoption:
Choose the percent of NYC's total building area where heat and hot water get converted from fossil fuel systems to air-source heat pumps.
Upgrades:
See Table 4 on page 44 of the Grid Ready Report for a full list of the energy efficiency and demand flexibility measures.
Data Stats:
FAQs
What is the overall scope of this research project?
This research explored how building power demand will change as heating and hot water systems are converted to heat pumps. We focused only on buildings both for simplicity and because they use most of NYC’s energy today. Their electrification is likely to have the biggest influence on future power demand.
We compared current and future power demands to explore how many buildings could electrify before networks exceed today’s peaks. This is the first step in understanding community infrastructure needs, but there will be upgrades needed block by block that we cannot yet predict. Future rate cases will address these upgrades and other major capital investments to advance beneficial electrification and continued reliability and resiliency needs due to the evolving dynamic electric grid.
Electrifying NYC buildings is a multi-decade challenge. NYC’s local distribution grid currently is reliable and has a process for gradual upgrades and long-term planning to meet evolving system needs. Our findings are not a substitute for a detailed distribution upgrade plan that considers the factors above and others to identify capacity investment needs in specific locations on Con Edison’s network system.
Were other types of electrification considered in this analysis (EVs, Cooking, etc..)?
This work serves as a starting point to understanding how electrification will affect NYC’s grid. Other factors that will impact its reliability but are not part of this current research include:
Where can I find out more about the electrical service near my building?
Con Edison maintains a Hosting Capacity Platform that is designed for customers to identify opportunities for private generation within Con Ed’s local distribution network. This platform includes detailed data on the capacity and demand within each network area.
Does this analysis consider the electrical service capacity at the block or feeder level?
No, not explicitly. This analysis assumes that the buildings within a network area can access power up to the capacity of that specific network area. This is true when you aggregate all building power demand up to the network area, but each network area is made up of lower-level infrastructure—primary feeders, low-voltage transformers and other wires—which could temporarily limit the power supply to a specific set of buildings within a network area. Standard upgrades to low-voltage equipment—on the local grid and inside buildings—will be required to accommodate electrification. Many of these upgrades are already part of Con Edison's standard processes, so they’ll take place incrementally and will not limit electrification in the same way as the overall capacity of a network area.